Care home beds per 1,000 people aged 65 and over, by local authority (2026 Q4)
- Data collected
- CQC register read 9 November 2026
- Care Inspectorate register read 10 November 2026
- CIW register read 10 November 2026
- RQIA register read 10 November 2026
- ONS Postcode Directory edition AUG_2026
- ONS population estimates mid-2025
- Published
- Last updated
Across the United Kingdom there are 36.8 care home beds for every 1,000 people aged 65 and over: 495,491 beds in 15,725 homes, against 13,460,704 people aged 65 and over.
The table is our own aggregation and is free to reuse under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0), with a link to this page.
All local authorities
| Local authority | Code | Nation | Homes | Beds | People aged 65+ | Beds per 1,000 | Rating mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aberdeen City | S12000033 | Scotland | 50 | 1,699 | 40,773 | 41.7 | Very good (5): 5; Good (4): 28; Adequate (3): 11; Weak (2): 1; Not rated: 5 |
| Aberdeenshire | S12000034 | Scotland | 64 | 1,784 | 60,203 | 29.6 | Very good (5): 7; Good (4): 44; Adequate (3): 2; Weak (2): 2; Unsatisfactory (1): 1; Not rated: 8 |
| Adur | E07000223 | England | 14 | 426 | 15,865 | 26.9 | Good: 13; Requires improvement: 1 |
| Amber Valley | E07000032 | England | 38 | 1,230 | 30,524 | 40.3 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 29; Requires improvement: 5; Not rated: 2 |
| Angus | S12000041 | Scotland | 28 | 1,033 | 30,379 | 34.0 | Very good (5): 2; Good (4): 15; Adequate (3): 11 |
| Antrim and Newtownabbey | N09000001 | Northern Ireland | 39 | 1,354 | 27,128 | 49.9 | Not rated: 39 |
| Ards and North Down | N09000011 | Northern Ireland | 52 | 1,878 | 39,191 | 47.9 | Not rated: 52 |
| Argyll and Bute | S12000035 | Scotland | 17 | 510 | 24,791 | 20.6 | Good (4): 12; Adequate (3): 4; Unsatisfactory (1): 1 |
| Armagh City, Banbridge and Craigavon | N09000002 | Northern Ireland | 37 | 1,293 | 38,626 | 33.5 | Not rated: 37 |
| Arun | E07000224 | England | 93 | 2,627 | 50,475 | 52.0 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 68; Requires improvement: 18; Not rated: 5 |
| Ashfield | E07000170 | England | 49 | 1,685 | 26,650 | 63.2 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 40; Requires improvement: 5; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 1 |
| Ashford | E07000105 | England | 37 | 967 | 28,414 | 34.0 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 33; Requires improvement: 3 |
| Babergh | E07000200 | England | 22 | 995 | 26,868 | 37.0 | Good: 16; Requires improvement: 4; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 1 |
| Barking and Dagenham | E09000002 | England | 23 | 657 | 20,520 | 32.0 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 19; Requires improvement: 1; Not rated: 2 |
| Barnet | E09000003 | England | 69 | 2,636 | 62,555 | 42.1 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 59; Requires improvement: 8; Not rated: 1 |
| Barnsley | E08000038 | England | 65 | 2,009 | 51,461 | 39.0 | Outstanding: 4; Good: 48; Requires improvement: 10; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 2 |
| Basildon | E07000066 | England | 23 | 721 | 33,442 | 21.6 | Outstanding: 3; Good: 16; Requires improvement: 3; Inadequate: 1 |
| Basingstoke and Deane | E07000084 | England | 47 | 1,216 | 35,529 | 34.2 | Outstanding: 4; Good: 37; Requires improvement: 6 |
| Bassetlaw | E07000171 | England | 41 | 1,259 | 28,598 | 44.0 | Outstanding: 5; Good: 25; Requires improvement: 9; Not rated: 2 |
| Bath and North East Somerset | E06000022 | England | 48 | 1,572 | 39,917 | 39.4 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 40; Requires improvement: 6; Not rated: 1 |
| Bedford | E06000055 | England | 64 | 1,581 | 34,234 | 46.2 | Outstanding: 4; Good: 44; Requires improvement: 13; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 2 |
| Belfast | N09000003 | Northern Ireland | 78 | 2,733 | 54,684 | 50.0 | Not rated: 78 |
| Bexley | E09000004 | England | 27 | 1,328 | 43,380 | 30.6 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 20; Requires improvement: 6 |
| Birmingham | E08000025 | England | 251 | 6,333 | 156,241 | 40.5 | Outstanding: 4; Good: 177; Requires improvement: 49; Inadequate: 3; Not rated: 18 |
| Blaby | E07000129 | England | 19 | 527 | 22,554 | 23.4 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 13; Requires improvement: 3; Not rated: 2 |
| Blackburn with Darwen | E06000008 | England | 34 | 1,058 | 23,510 | 45.0 | Good: 26; Requires improvement: 5; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 2 |
| Blackpool | E06000009 | England | 62 | 1,593 | 30,394 | 52.4 | Outstanding: 6; Good: 43; Requires improvement: 13 |
| Blaenau Gwent | W06000019 | Wales | 19 | 516 | 14,276 | 36.1 | Excellent: 1; Good: 13; Requires improvement: 1; Not rated: 4 |
| Bolsover | E07000033 | England | 25 | 668 | 17,714 | 37.7 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 21; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 2 |
| Bolton | E08000001 | England | 53 | 1,727 | 53,127 | 32.5 | Outstanding: 3; Good: 40; Requires improvement: 8; Not rated: 2 |
| Boston | E07000136 | England | 16 | 572 | 15,399 | 37.1 | Good: 13; Requires improvement: 2; Not rated: 1 |
| Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole | E06000058 | England | 124 | 3,915 | 90,622 | 43.2 | Outstanding: 8; Good: 110; Requires improvement: 5; Not rated: 1 |
| Bracknell Forest | E06000036 | England | 16 | 642 | 21,603 | 29.7 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 9; Requires improvement: 4; Not rated: 1 |
| Bradford | E08000032 | England | 93 | 3,477 | 89,524 | 38.8 | Outstanding: 4; Good: 66; Requires improvement: 20; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 2 |
| Braintree | E07000067 | England | 51 | 1,535 | 35,140 | 43.7 | Good: 38; Requires improvement: 11; Not rated: 2 |
| Breckland | E07000143 | England | 49 | 1,662 | 38,254 | 43.4 | Outstanding: 5; Good: 32; Requires improvement: 9; Inadequate: 2; Not rated: 1 |
| Brent | E09000005 | England | 44 | 941 | 44,479 | 21.2 | Good: 37; Requires improvement: 6; Not rated: 1 |
| Brentwood | E07000068 | England | 16 | 828 | 16,265 | 50.9 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 11; Requires improvement: 4 |
| Bridgend | W06000013 | Wales | 36 | 1,070 | 32,407 | 33.0 | Excellent: 4; Good: 26; Requires improvement: 3; Requires significant improvement: 1; Not rated: 2 |
| Brighton and Hove | E06000043 | England | 79 | 1,872 | 41,753 | 44.8 | Outstanding: 4; Good: 66; Requires improvement: 7; Not rated: 2 |
| Bristol, City of | E06000023 | England | 85 | 2,561 | 63,056 | 40.6 | Outstanding: 3; Good: 79; Requires improvement: 2; Not rated: 1 |
| Broadland | E07000144 | England | 56 | 1,640 | 36,593 | 44.8 | Outstanding: 3; Good: 30; Requires improvement: 17; Not rated: 6 |
| Bromley | E09000006 | England | 41 | 1,515 | 61,366 | 24.7 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 36; Requires improvement: 3 |
| Bromsgrove | E07000234 | England | 38 | 1,362 | 24,209 | 56.3 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 31; Requires improvement: 4; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 1 |
| Broxbourne | E07000095 | England | 14 | 344 | 18,051 | 19.1 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 9; Requires improvement: 3 |
| Broxtowe | E07000172 | England | 27 | 1,013 | 25,105 | 40.4 | Outstanding: 3; Good: 15; Requires improvement: 6; Not rated: 3 |
| Buckinghamshire | E06000060 | England | 118 | 4,124 | 113,210 | 36.4 | Outstanding: 4; Good: 76; Requires improvement: 29; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 8 |
| Burnley | E07000117 | England | 32 | 828 | 18,316 | 45.2 | Good: 25; Requires improvement: 6; Not rated: 1 |
| Bury | E08000002 | England | 46 | 1,427 | 37,185 | 38.4 | Outstanding: 4; Good: 36; Requires improvement: 5; Not rated: 1 |
| Caerphilly | W06000018 | Wales | 59 | 1,140 | 37,231 | 30.6 | Excellent: 5; Good: 33; Requires improvement: 2; Requires significant improvement: 2; Not rated: 17 |
| Calderdale | E08000033 | England | 43 | 1,257 | 42,185 | 29.8 | Outstanding: 3; Good: 29; Requires improvement: 9; Not rated: 2 |
| Cambridge | E07000008 | England | 14 | 702 | 17,732 | 39.6 | Good: 12; Requires improvement: 1; Not rated: 1 |
| Camden | E09000007 | England | 10 | 428 | 27,160 | 15.8 | Good: 9; Requires improvement: 1 |
| Cannock Chase | E07000192 | England | 26 | 721 | 21,101 | 34.2 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 16; Requires improvement: 4; Not rated: 5 |
| Canterbury | E07000106 | England | 61 | 1,819 | 36,995 | 49.2 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 40; Requires improvement: 16; Inadequate: 2; Not rated: 2 |
| Cardiff | W06000015 | Wales | 74 | 2,133 | 57,215 | 37.3 | Excellent: 13; Good: 47; Requires improvement: 4; Requires significant improvement: 3; Not rated: 7 |
| Carmarthenshire | W06000010 | Wales | 89 | 2,212 | 48,725 | 45.4 | Excellent: 10; Good: 65; Requires improvement: 5; Not rated: 9 |
| Castle Point | E07000069 | England | 15 | 552 | 23,502 | 23.5 | Good: 11; Requires improvement: 3; Not rated: 1 |
| Causeway Coast and Glens | N09000004 | Northern Ireland | 29 | 887 | 29,788 | 29.8 | Not rated: 29 |
| Central Bedfordshire | E06000056 | England | 60 | 1,974 | 59,317 | 33.3 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 35; Requires improvement: 13; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 9 |
| Ceredigion | W06000008 | Wales | 20 | 466 | 19,594 | 23.8 | Excellent: 3; Good: 14; Requires significant improvement: 1; Not rated: 2 |
| Charnwood | E07000130 | England | 44 | 1,287 | 37,407 | 34.4 | Good: 34; Requires improvement: 9; Inadequate: 1 |
| Chelmsford | E07000070 | England | 22 | 1,046 | 36,993 | 28.3 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 16; Requires improvement: 3; Not rated: 2 |
| Cheltenham | E07000078 | England | 32 | 1,284 | 24,777 | 51.8 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 23; Requires improvement: 7 |
| Cherwell | E07000177 | England | 25 | 1,166 | 31,273 | 37.3 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 18; Requires improvement: 3; Not rated: 2 |
| Cheshire East | E06000049 | England | 92 | 4,133 | 97,536 | 42.4 | Outstanding: 4; Good: 61; Requires improvement: 21; Not rated: 6 |
| Cheshire West and Chester | E06000050 | England | 66 | 2,494 | 82,254 | 30.3 | Good: 46; Requires improvement: 16; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 3 |
| Chesterfield | E07000034 | England | 41 | 1,124 | 24,120 | 46.6 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 30; Requires improvement: 8; Not rated: 1 |
| Chichester | E07000225 | England | 44 | 1,699 | 36,790 | 46.2 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 35; Requires improvement: 5; Not rated: 3 |
| Chorley | E07000118 | England | 30 | 1,066 | 25,917 | 41.1 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 21; Requires improvement: 7; Not rated: 1 |
| City of Edinburgh | S12000036 | Scotland | 80 | 3,073 | 87,134 | 35.3 | Very good (5): 20; Good (4): 40; Adequate (3): 8; Weak (2): 1; Not rated: 11 |
| City of London | E09000001 | England | 0 | 0 | 1,441 | 0.0 | none |
| Clackmannanshire | S12000005 | Scotland | 9 | 349 | 11,373 | 30.7 | Very good (5): 1; Good (4): 3; Adequate (3): 4; Not rated: 1 |
| Colchester | E07000071 | England | 71 | 1,594 | 36,787 | 43.3 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 58; Requires improvement: 8; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 3 |
| Conwy | W06000003 | Wales | 72 | 1,526 | 33,237 | 45.9 | Excellent: 2; Good: 48; Requires improvement: 1; Requires significant improvement: 3; Not rated: 18 |
| Cornwall | E06000052 | England | 190 | 4,564 | 154,714 | 29.5 | Outstanding: 4; Good: 150; Requires improvement: 34; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 1 |
| Cotswold | E07000079 | England | 17 | 941 | 25,909 | 36.3 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 14; Requires improvement: 2 |
| County Durham | E06000047 | England | 128 | 4,670 | 120,397 | 38.8 | Outstanding: 6; Good: 104; Requires improvement: 11; Not rated: 7 |
| Coventry | E08000026 | England | 59 | 1,652 | 51,703 | 32.0 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 37; Requires improvement: 18; Not rated: 3 |
| Crawley | E07000226 | England | 16 | 351 | 17,135 | 20.5 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 12; Requires improvement: 2 |
| Croydon | E09000008 | England | 110 | 2,532 | 58,601 | 43.2 | Outstanding: 3; Good: 95; Requires improvement: 10; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 1 |
| Cumberland | E06000063 | England | 77 | 2,316 | 69,038 | 33.5 | Outstanding: 3; Good: 57; Requires improvement: 15; Not rated: 2 |
| Dacorum | E07000096 | England | 26 | 992 | 29,290 | 33.9 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 16; Requires improvement: 7; Not rated: 2 |
| Darlington | E06000005 | England | 28 | 1,109 | 24,376 | 45.5 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 22; Requires improvement: 3; Not rated: 1 |
| Dartford | E07000107 | England | 20 | 867 | 17,008 | 51.0 | Good: 12; Requires improvement: 7; Inadequate: 1 |
| Denbighshire | W06000004 | Wales | 53 | 1,317 | 25,140 | 52.4 | Good: 35; Requires improvement: 6; Requires significant improvement: 2; Not rated: 10 |
| Derby | E06000015 | England | 61 | 1,945 | 45,389 | 42.9 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 39; Requires improvement: 17; Not rated: 3 |
| Derbyshire Dales | E07000035 | England | 17 | 600 | 21,563 | 27.8 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 14; Requires improvement: 1; Not rated: 1 |
| Derry City and Strabane | N09000005 | Northern Ireland | 25 | 811 | 26,538 | 30.6 | Not rated: 25 |
| Doncaster | E08000017 | England | 71 | 2,164 | 64,028 | 33.8 | Outstanding: 4; Good: 52; Requires improvement: 12; Inadequate: 2; Not rated: 1 |
| Dorset | E06000059 | England | 103 | 3,670 | 121,959 | 30.1 | Outstanding: 6; Good: 87; Requires improvement: 6; Not rated: 4 |
| Dover | E07000108 | England | 52 | 1,179 | 30,466 | 38.7 | Outstanding: 4; Good: 34; Requires improvement: 11; Inadequate: 2; Not rated: 1 |
| Dudley | E08000027 | England | 86 | 2,193 | 67,639 | 32.4 | Good: 55; Requires improvement: 21; Inadequate: 2; Not rated: 8 |
| Dumfries and Galloway | S12000006 | Scotland | 31 | 1,073 | 41,713 | 25.7 | Very good (5): 3; Good (4): 16; Adequate (3): 10; Weak (2): 1; Not rated: 1 |
| Dundee City | S12000042 | Scotland | 27 | 1,024 | 27,969 | 36.6 | Very good (5): 5; Good (4): 13; Adequate (3): 8; Weak (2): 1 |
| Ealing | E09000009 | England | 35 | 1,445 | 50,302 | 28.7 | Good: 29; Requires improvement: 6 |
| East Ayrshire | S12000008 | Scotland | 26 | 959 | 27,393 | 35.0 | Very good (5): 3; Good (4): 14; Adequate (3): 6; Not rated: 3 |
| East Cambridgeshire | E07000009 | England | 20 | 759 | 20,311 | 37.4 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 16; Requires improvement: 2 |
| East Devon | E07000040 | England | 65 | 1,739 | 48,799 | 35.6 | Outstanding: 10; Good: 48; Requires improvement: 4; Not rated: 3 |
| East Dunbartonshire | S12000045 | Scotland | 19 | 949 | 27,886 | 34.0 | Very good (5): 4; Good (4): 14; Not rated: 1 |
| East Hampshire | E07000085 | England | 49 | 1,536 | 32,541 | 47.2 | Outstanding: 4; Good: 36; Requires improvement: 8; Not rated: 1 |
| East Hertfordshire | E07000242 | England | 22 | 1,106 | 30,479 | 36.3 | Good: 18; Requires improvement: 2; Not rated: 2 |
| East Lindsey | E07000137 | England | 72 | 1,911 | 47,193 | 40.5 | Outstanding: 3; Good: 55; Requires improvement: 13; Not rated: 1 |
| East Lothian | S12000010 | Scotland | 17 | 785 | 25,963 | 30.2 | Very good (5): 2; Good (4): 12; Adequate (3): 3 |
| East Renfrewshire | S12000011 | Scotland | 16 | 852 | 22,490 | 37.9 | Very good (5): 2; Good (4): 11; Adequate (3): 2; Not rated: 1 |
| East Riding of Yorkshire | E06000011 | England | 127 | 4,357 | 99,256 | 43.9 | Outstanding: 11; Good: 87; Requires improvement: 26; Not rated: 3 |
| East Staffordshire | E07000193 | England | 49 | 1,126 | 25,637 | 43.9 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 32; Requires improvement: 8; Not rated: 7 |
| East Suffolk | E07000244 | England | 73 | 2,630 | 73,963 | 35.6 | Outstanding: 9; Good: 53; Requires improvement: 8; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 2 |
| Eastbourne | E07000061 | England | 55 | 1,579 | 26,399 | 59.8 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 44; Requires improvement: 8; Not rated: 1 |
| Eastleigh | E07000086 | England | 43 | 1,427 | 29,300 | 48.7 | Outstanding: 3; Good: 30; Requires improvement: 6; Not rated: 4 |
| Elmbridge | E07000207 | England | 28 | 1,365 | 26,850 | 50.8 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 20; Requires improvement: 6; Not rated: 1 |
| Enfield | E09000010 | England | 79 | 1,908 | 49,734 | 38.4 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 59; Requires improvement: 12; Not rated: 7 |
| Epping Forest | E07000072 | England | 21 | 1,206 | 28,245 | 42.7 | Good: 14; Requires improvement: 6; Not rated: 1 |
| Epsom and Ewell | E07000208 | England | 22 | 386 | 15,336 | 25.2 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 20; Requires improvement: 1 |
| Erewash | E07000036 | England | 26 | 805 | 24,517 | 32.8 | Good: 24; Requires improvement: 2 |
| Exeter | E07000041 | England | 32 | 1,119 | 23,095 | 48.5 | Outstanding: 4; Good: 25; Requires improvement: 2; Not rated: 1 |
| Falkirk | S12000014 | Scotland | 32 | 1,099 | 32,727 | 33.6 | Very good (5): 3; Good (4): 20; Adequate (3): 5; Weak (2): 1; Not rated: 3 |
| Fareham | E07000087 | England | 49 | 1,378 | 30,516 | 45.2 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 39; Requires improvement: 8 |
| Fenland | E07000010 | England | 26 | 1,003 | 24,903 | 40.3 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 21; Requires improvement: 2; Not rated: 2 |
| Fermanagh and Omagh | N09000006 | Northern Ireland | 33 | 835 | 23,722 | 35.2 | Not rated: 33 |
| Fife | S12000047 | Scotland | 79 | 3,261 | 85,537 | 38.1 | Very good (5): 7; Good (4): 45; Adequate (3): 25; Not rated: 2 |
| Flintshire | W06000005 | Wales | 36 | 985 | 35,052 | 28.1 | Excellent: 2; Good: 22; Requires improvement: 3; Requires significant improvement: 2; Not rated: 7 |
| Folkestone and Hythe | E07000112 | England | 70 | 1,346 | 29,584 | 45.5 | Good: 53; Requires improvement: 14; Not rated: 3 |
| Forest of Dean | E07000080 | England | 33 | 568 | 23,485 | 24.2 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 27; Requires improvement: 4 |
| Fylde | E07000119 | England | 36 | 1,158 | 25,844 | 44.8 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 28; Requires improvement: 5; Not rated: 2 |
| Gateshead | E08000037 | England | 44 | 1,785 | 41,971 | 42.5 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 40; Requires improvement: 2 |
| Gedling | E07000173 | England | 25 | 775 | 26,621 | 29.1 | Good: 19; Requires improvement: 5; Inadequate: 1 |
| Glasgow City | S12000049 | Scotland | 93 | 4,315 | 93,189 | 46.3 | Very good (5): 6; Good (4): 61; Adequate (3): 13; Weak (2): 2; Not rated: 11 |
| Gloucester | E07000081 | England | 49 | 1,055 | 23,910 | 44.1 | Outstanding: 6; Good: 37; Requires improvement: 5; Not rated: 1 |
| Gosport | E07000088 | England | 22 | 551 | 19,161 | 28.8 | Good: 19; Requires improvement: 3 |
| Gravesham | E07000109 | England | 14 | 470 | 18,809 | 25.0 | Good: 6; Requires improvement: 7; Not rated: 1 |
| Great Yarmouth | E07000145 | England | 32 | 965 | 25,483 | 37.9 | Good: 17; Requires improvement: 11; Inadequate: 2; Not rated: 2 |
| Greenwich | E09000011 | England | 43 | 962 | 33,428 | 28.8 | Good: 34; Requires improvement: 7; Not rated: 2 |
| Guildford | E07000209 | England | 30 | 967 | 26,529 | 36.5 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 20; Requires improvement: 7; Not rated: 2 |
| Gwynedd | W06000002 | Wales | 40 | 1,032 | 28,691 | 36.0 | Good: 31; Requires improvement: 4; Requires significant improvement: 1; Not rated: 4 |
| Hackney | E09000012 | England | 13 | 314 | 23,716 | 13.2 | Good: 11; Requires improvement: 2 |
| Halton | E06000006 | England | 25 | 747 | 25,817 | 28.9 | Good: 18; Requires improvement: 6; Not rated: 1 |
| Hammersmith and Fulham | E09000013 | England | 8 | 456 | 21,378 | 21.3 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 6; Requires improvement: 1 |
| Harborough | E07000131 | England | 16 | 803 | 24,509 | 32.8 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 12; Requires improvement: 3 |
| Haringey | E09000014 | England | 21 | 327 | 31,069 | 10.5 | Good: 20; Requires improvement: 1 |
| Harlow | E07000073 | England | 6 | 363 | 14,490 | 25.1 | Good: 5; Requires improvement: 1 |
| Harrow | E09000015 | England | 48 | 1,272 | 43,860 | 29.0 | Outstanding: 3; Good: 41; Requires improvement: 3; Not rated: 1 |
| Hart | E07000089 | England | 15 | 670 | 21,796 | 30.7 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 9; Requires improvement: 2; Not rated: 2 |
| Hartlepool | E06000001 | England | 25 | 887 | 20,214 | 43.9 | Good: 22; Requires improvement: 2; Not rated: 1 |
| Hastings | E07000062 | England | 58 | 1,392 | 19,444 | 71.6 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 46; Requires improvement: 11 |
| Havant | E07000090 | England | 41 | 1,077 | 32,385 | 33.3 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 35; Requires improvement: 5 |
| Havering | E09000016 | England | 54 | 1,657 | 48,496 | 34.2 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 47; Requires improvement: 4; Not rated: 2 |
| Herefordshire, County of | E06000019 | England | 84 | 2,181 | 52,724 | 41.4 | Outstanding: 6; Good: 62; Requires improvement: 11; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 4 |
| Hertsmere | E07000098 | England | 24 | 1,100 | 20,793 | 52.9 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 15; Requires improvement: 5; Not rated: 2 |
| High Peak | E07000037 | England | 18 | 478 | 21,824 | 21.9 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 4; Requires improvement: 12; Not rated: 1 |
| Highland | S12000017 | Scotland | 68 | 2,043 | 59,658 | 34.2 | Very good (5): 10; Good (4): 42; Adequate (3): 9; Weak (2): 3; Not rated: 4 |
| Hillingdon | E09000017 | England | 39 | 1,221 | 44,348 | 27.5 | Good: 34; Requires improvement: 4; Not rated: 1 |
| Hinckley and Bosworth | E07000132 | England | 22 | 806 | 27,227 | 29.6 | Good: 19; Requires improvement: 2; Not rated: 1 |
| Horsham | E07000227 | England | 30 | 1,272 | 36,659 | 34.7 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 25; Requires improvement: 3 |
| Hounslow | E09000018 | England | 30 | 775 | 37,855 | 20.5 | Outstanding: 3; Good: 24; Requires improvement: 1; Not rated: 2 |
| Huntingdonshire | E07000011 | England | 35 | 1,299 | 40,212 | 32.3 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 26; Requires improvement: 5; Not rated: 3 |
| Hyndburn | E07000120 | England | 37 | 797 | 15,724 | 50.7 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 27; Requires improvement: 6; Not rated: 2 |
| Inverclyde | S12000018 | Scotland | 18 | 756 | 18,617 | 40.6 | Very good (5): 2; Good (4): 9; Adequate (3): 3; Weak (2): 1; Not rated: 3 |
| Ipswich | E07000202 | England | 21 | 909 | 24,257 | 37.5 | Outstanding: 3; Good: 15; Requires improvement: 1; Not rated: 2 |
| Isle of Anglesey | W06000001 | Wales | 25 | 616 | 19,357 | 31.8 | Excellent: 1; Good: 14; Requires improvement: 1; Requires significant improvement: 1; Not rated: 8 |
| Isle of Wight | E06000046 | England | 55 | 1,552 | 43,599 | 35.6 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 38; Requires improvement: 12; Inadequate: 3 |
| Isles of Scilly | E06000053 | England | 1 | 14 | 616 | 22.7 | Requires improvement: 1 |
| Islington | E09000019 | England | 15 | 555 | 22,477 | 24.7 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 14 |
| Kensington and Chelsea | E09000020 | England | 10 | 373 | 23,486 | 15.9 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 7; Requires improvement: 1 |
| King's Lynn and West Norfolk | E07000146 | England | 41 | 1,438 | 42,344 | 34.0 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 24; Requires improvement: 13; Inadequate: 2; Not rated: 1 |
| Kingston upon Hull, City of | E06000010 | England | 72 | 1,988 | 43,349 | 45.9 | Good: 49; Requires improvement: 19; Not rated: 4 |
| Kingston upon Thames | E09000021 | England | 34 | 1,082 | 26,622 | 40.6 | Outstanding: 3; Good: 28; Requires improvement: 3 |
| Kirklees | E08000034 | England | 112 | 2,977 | 82,473 | 36.1 | Outstanding: 3; Good: 81; Requires improvement: 25; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 2 |
| Knowsley | E08000011 | England | 19 | 780 | 28,984 | 26.9 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 10; Requires improvement: 4; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 3 |
| Lambeth | E09000022 | England | 32 | 834 | 31,319 | 26.6 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 22; Requires improvement: 9 |
| Lancaster | E07000121 | England | 42 | 1,268 | 31,213 | 40.6 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 35; Requires improvement: 5 |
| Leeds | E08000035 | England | 138 | 4,951 | 133,810 | 37.0 | Outstanding: 4; Good: 99; Requires improvement: 26; Not rated: 9 |
| Leicester | E06000016 | England | 89 | 2,540 | 47,719 | 53.2 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 69; Requires improvement: 16; Not rated: 3 |
| Lewes | E07000063 | England | 38 | 983 | 28,101 | 35.0 | Good: 30; Requires improvement: 7; Not rated: 1 |
| Lewisham | E09000023 | England | 44 | 701 | 32,532 | 21.5 | Good: 39; Requires improvement: 2; Not rated: 3 |
| Lichfield | E07000194 | England | 25 | 991 | 27,393 | 36.2 | Good: 15; Requires improvement: 7; Not rated: 3 |
| Lincoln | E07000138 | England | 28 | 977 | 16,171 | 60.4 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 17; Requires improvement: 8; Not rated: 2 |
| Lisburn and Castlereagh | N09000007 | Northern Ireland | 32 | 1,367 | 28,728 | 47.6 | Not rated: 32 |
| Liverpool | E08000012 | England | 76 | 2,758 | 79,708 | 34.6 | Outstanding: 3; Good: 46; Requires improvement: 21; Inadequate: 3; Not rated: 3 |
| Luton | E06000032 | England | 32 | 836 | 27,710 | 30.2 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 20; Requires improvement: 7; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 2 |
| Maidstone | E07000110 | England | 40 | 1,539 | 36,308 | 42.4 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 30; Requires improvement: 6; Inadequate: 2; Not rated: 1 |
| Maldon | E07000074 | England | 19 | 523 | 18,541 | 28.2 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 15; Requires improvement: 2; Inadequate: 1 |
| Malvern Hills | E07000235 | England | 31 | 1,199 | 24,476 | 49.0 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 23; Requires improvement: 6; Not rated: 1 |
| Manchester | E08000003 | England | 74 | 1,977 | 56,354 | 35.1 | Outstanding: 3; Good: 53; Requires improvement: 9; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 8 |
| Mansfield | E07000174 | England | 36 | 1,078 | 23,001 | 46.9 | Outstanding: 4; Good: 27; Requires improvement: 3; Not rated: 2 |
| Medway | E06000035 | England | 63 | 1,598 | 49,047 | 32.6 | Good: 42; Requires improvement: 16; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 4 |
| Melton | E07000133 | England | 9 | 346 | 13,341 | 25.9 | Good: 4; Requires improvement: 4; Not rated: 1 |
| Merthyr Tydfil | W06000024 | Wales | 21 | 402 | 11,741 | 34.2 | Excellent: 3; Good: 13; Requires improvement: 4; Not rated: 1 |
| Merton | E09000024 | England | 33 | 792 | 29,748 | 26.6 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 31; Not rated: 1 |
| Mid and East Antrim | N09000008 | Northern Ireland | 36 | 1,250 | 29,473 | 42.4 | Not rated: 36 |
| Mid Devon | E07000042 | England | 23 | 501 | 21,642 | 23.1 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 17; Requires improvement: 3; Inadequate: 1 |
| Mid Suffolk | E07000203 | England | 20 | 796 | 29,194 | 27.3 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 14; Requires improvement: 4 |
| Mid Sussex | E07000228 | England | 44 | 1,400 | 34,516 | 40.6 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 39; Requires improvement: 2; Not rated: 1 |
| Mid Ulster | N09000009 | Northern Ireland | 34 | 915 | 24,928 | 36.7 | Not rated: 34 |
| Middlesbrough | E06000002 | England | 45 | 1,633 | 26,536 | 61.5 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 37; Requires improvement: 2; Not rated: 4 |
| Midlothian | S12000019 | Scotland | 13 | 576 | 19,847 | 29.0 | Good (4): 6; Adequate (3): 5; Not rated: 2 |
| Milton Keynes | E06000042 | England | 46 | 1,640 | 44,895 | 36.5 | Outstanding: 3; Good: 34; Requires improvement: 4; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 4 |
| Mole Valley | E07000210 | England | 29 | 948 | 22,282 | 42.5 | Good: 22; Requires improvement: 7 |
| Monmouthshire | W06000021 | Wales | 29 | 762 | 25,694 | 29.7 | Excellent: 3; Good: 12; Requires improvement: 6; Requires significant improvement: 1; Not rated: 7 |
| Moray | S12000020 | Scotland | 16 | 612 | 22,803 | 26.8 | Very good (5): 4; Good (4): 8; Adequate (3): 1; Weak (2): 1; Not rated: 2 |
| Na h-Eileanan Siar | S12000013 | Scotland | 9 | 217 | 7,249 | 29.9 | Good (4): 9 |
| Neath Port Talbot | W06000012 | Wales | 54 | 1,130 | 31,829 | 35.5 | Excellent: 4; Good: 38; Requires improvement: 6; Not rated: 6 |
| New Forest | E07000091 | England | 82 | 2,479 | 55,122 | 45.0 | Outstanding: 4; Good: 68; Requires improvement: 8; Not rated: 2 |
| Newark and Sherwood | E07000175 | England | 34 | 1,005 | 30,149 | 33.3 | Outstanding: 5; Good: 24; Requires improvement: 4; Inadequate: 1 |
| Newcastle upon Tyne | E08000021 | England | 70 | 2,555 | 48,474 | 52.7 | Outstanding: 6; Good: 50; Requires improvement: 6; Not rated: 8 |
| Newcastle-under-Lyme | E07000195 | England | 35 | 1,063 | 28,085 | 37.8 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 27; Requires improvement: 4; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 2 |
| Newham | E09000025 | England | 19 | 570 | 29,303 | 19.5 | Good: 16; Requires improvement: 2; Not rated: 1 |
| Newport | W06000022 | Wales | 39 | 927 | 28,735 | 32.3 | Excellent: 2; Good: 19; Requires improvement: 3; Requires significant improvement: 1; Not rated: 14 |
| Newry, Mourne and Down | N09000010 | Northern Ireland | 44 | 1,365 | 33,679 | 40.5 | Not rated: 44 |
| North Ayrshire | S12000021 | Scotland | 24 | 1,096 | 33,572 | 32.6 | Very good (5): 3; Good (4): 14; Adequate (3): 6; Weak (2): 1 |
| North Devon | E07000043 | England | 27 | 862 | 27,385 | 31.5 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 20; Requires improvement: 6 |
| North East Derbyshire | E07000038 | England | 22 | 744 | 27,005 | 27.6 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 13; Requires improvement: 5; Not rated: 3 |
| North East Lincolnshire | E06000012 | England | 42 | 1,210 | 35,303 | 34.3 | Outstanding: 5; Good: 30; Requires improvement: 4; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 2 |
| North Hertfordshire | E07000099 | England | 29 | 1,313 | 28,123 | 46.7 | Good: 20; Requires improvement: 7; Not rated: 2 |
| North Kesteven | E07000139 | England | 50 | 1,338 | 29,929 | 44.7 | Outstanding: 5; Good: 36; Requires improvement: 7; Not rated: 2 |
| North Lanarkshire | S12000050 | Scotland | 28 | 1,585 | 64,861 | 24.4 | Very good (5): 1; Good (4): 17; Adequate (3): 7; Weak (2): 1; Not rated: 2 |
| North Lincolnshire | E06000013 | England | 54 | 1,768 | 40,054 | 44.1 | Outstanding: 6; Good: 36; Requires improvement: 11; Not rated: 1 |
| North Norfolk | E07000147 | England | 51 | 1,394 | 36,957 | 37.7 | Outstanding: 3; Good: 25; Requires improvement: 20; Inadequate: 2; Not rated: 1 |
| North Northamptonshire | E06000061 | England | 100 | 2,863 | 70,585 | 40.6 | Outstanding: 8; Good: 73; Requires improvement: 16; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 2 |
| North Somerset | E06000024 | England | 85 | 2,595 | 55,209 | 47.0 | Good: 80; Requires improvement: 4; Not rated: 1 |
| North Tyneside | E08000022 | England | 40 | 1,625 | 46,596 | 34.9 | Outstanding: 4; Good: 31; Requires improvement: 4; Not rated: 1 |
| North Warwickshire | E07000218 | England | 24 | 792 | 15,297 | 51.8 | Good: 19; Requires improvement: 5 |
| North West Leicestershire | E07000134 | England | 18 | 447 | 23,011 | 19.4 | Good: 13; Requires improvement: 3; Not rated: 2 |
| North Yorkshire | E06000065 | England | 184 | 6,259 | 170,388 | 36.7 | Outstanding: 7; Good: 148; Requires improvement: 24; Not rated: 5 |
| Northumberland | E06000057 | England | 89 | 3,266 | 90,910 | 35.9 | Outstanding: 3; Good: 78; Requires improvement: 7; Not rated: 1 |
| Norwich | E07000148 | England | 25 | 955 | 22,412 | 42.6 | Outstanding: 3; Good: 14; Requires improvement: 7; Not rated: 1 |
| Nottingham | E06000018 | England | 71 | 1,758 | 39,820 | 44.1 | Outstanding: 9; Good: 43; Requires improvement: 15; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 3 |
| Nuneaton and Bedworth | E07000219 | England | 35 | 882 | 27,137 | 32.5 | Good: 23; Requires improvement: 8; Not rated: 4 |
| Oadby and Wigston | E07000135 | England | 19 | 520 | 12,800 | 40.6 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 15; Requires improvement: 2; Not rated: 1 |
| Oldham | E08000004 | England | 42 | 1,508 | 40,263 | 37.5 | Good: 33; Requires improvement: 5; Not rated: 4 |
| Orkney Islands | S12000023 | Scotland | 5 | 124 | 5,877 | 21.1 | Good (4): 4; Adequate (3): 1 |
| Oxford | E07000178 | England | 15 | 697 | 20,409 | 34.2 | Good: 12; Requires improvement: 3 |
| Pembrokeshire | W06000009 | Wales | 65 | 1,166 | 34,807 | 33.5 | Excellent: 1; Good: 52; Requires improvement: 8; Not rated: 4 |
| Pendle | E07000122 | England | 20 | 660 | 18,500 | 35.7 | Good: 16; Requires improvement: 4 |
| Perth and Kinross | S12000048 | Scotland | 46 | 1,782 | 39,639 | 45.0 | Very good (5): 2; Good (4): 29; Adequate (3): 13; Not rated: 2 |
| Peterborough | E06000031 | England | 33 | 1,384 | 32,673 | 42.4 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 26; Requires improvement: 4; Not rated: 1 |
| Plymouth | E06000026 | England | 81 | 2,119 | 52,103 | 40.7 | Outstanding: 8; Good: 55; Requires improvement: 16; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 1 |
| Portsmouth | E06000044 | England | 28 | 901 | 32,607 | 27.6 | Good: 20; Requires improvement: 8 |
| Powys | W06000023 | Wales | 40 | 1,195 | 39,895 | 30.0 | Excellent: 1; Good: 34; Requires improvement: 2; Not rated: 3 |
| Preston | E07000123 | England | 42 | 1,309 | 23,825 | 54.9 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 31; Requires improvement: 5; Not rated: 4 |
| Reading | E06000038 | England | 30 | 896 | 22,678 | 39.5 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 20; Requires improvement: 6; Not rated: 2 |
| Redbridge | E09000026 | England | 68 | 1,223 | 41,272 | 29.6 | Good: 57; Requires improvement: 8; Not rated: 3 |
| Redcar and Cleveland | E06000003 | England | 38 | 1,276 | 34,258 | 37.2 | Good: 32; Requires improvement: 5; Not rated: 1 |
| Redditch | E07000236 | England | 10 | 366 | 17,174 | 21.3 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 8; Requires improvement: 1 |
| Reigate and Banstead | E07000211 | England | 65 | 1,915 | 29,736 | 64.4 | Outstanding: 5; Good: 44; Requires improvement: 14; Not rated: 2 |
| Renfrewshire | S12000038 | Scotland | 27 | 1,416 | 38,622 | 36.7 | Very good (5): 4; Good (4): 13; Adequate (3): 8; Weak (2): 1; Not rated: 1 |
| Rhondda Cynon Taf | W06000016 | Wales | 56 | 1,292 | 49,032 | 26.4 | Excellent: 8; Good: 38; Requires improvement: 6; Requires significant improvement: 1; Not rated: 3 |
| Ribble Valley | E07000124 | England | 11 | 491 | 16,979 | 28.9 | Good: 10; Not rated: 1 |
| Richmond upon Thames | E09000027 | England | 35 | 650 | 34,511 | 18.8 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 32; Requires improvement: 2 |
| Rochdale | E08000005 | England | 57 | 1,476 | 39,319 | 37.5 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 30; Requires improvement: 18; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 7 |
| Rochford | E07000075 | England | 15 | 485 | 21,262 | 22.8 | Good: 13; Requires improvement: 1; Not rated: 1 |
| Rossendale | E07000125 | England | 26 | 768 | 14,537 | 52.8 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 19; Requires improvement: 6 |
| Rother | E07000064 | England | 55 | 1,635 | 31,939 | 51.2 | Good: 48; Requires improvement: 6; Not rated: 1 |
| Rotherham | E08000018 | England | 74 | 2,098 | 55,447 | 37.8 | Outstanding: 7; Good: 58; Requires improvement: 9 |
| Rugby | E07000220 | England | 27 | 995 | 22,333 | 44.6 | Good: 18; Requires improvement: 7; Not rated: 2 |
| Runnymede | E07000212 | England | 14 | 719 | 16,301 | 44.1 | Good: 10; Requires improvement: 4 |
| Rushcliffe | E07000176 | England | 35 | 1,184 | 28,728 | 41.2 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 26; Requires improvement: 4; Not rated: 3 |
| Rushmoor | E07000092 | England | 21 | 708 | 16,543 | 42.8 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 17; Requires improvement: 2; Not rated: 1 |
| Rutland | E06000017 | England | 11 | 452 | 11,243 | 40.2 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 8; Requires improvement: 2 |
| Salford | E08000006 | England | 40 | 1,386 | 37,448 | 37.0 | Good: 28; Requires improvement: 8; Not rated: 4 |
| Sandwell | E08000028 | England | 81 | 1,815 | 51,493 | 35.2 | Good: 53; Requires improvement: 19; Not rated: 9 |
| Scottish Borders | S12000026 | Scotland | 26 | 763 | 32,754 | 23.3 | Good (4): 23; Adequate (3): 2; Weak (2): 1 |
| Sefton | E08000014 | England | 101 | 3,026 | 69,531 | 43.5 | Outstanding: 3; Good: 75; Requires improvement: 19; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 3 |
| Sevenoaks | E07000111 | England | 22 | 1,091 | 27,667 | 39.4 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 16; Requires improvement: 3; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 1 |
| Sheffield | E08000039 | England | 105 | 3,898 | 99,123 | 39.3 | Outstanding: 4; Good: 84; Requires improvement: 12; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 4 |
| Shetland Islands | S12000027 | Scotland | 10 | 155 | 5,291 | 29.3 | Good (4): 6; Adequate (3): 3; Weak (2): 1 |
| Shropshire | E06000051 | England | 110 | 3,526 | 90,151 | 39.1 | Outstanding: 5; Good: 78; Requires improvement: 18; Inadequate: 2; Not rated: 7 |
| Slough | E06000039 | England | 14 | 444 | 16,780 | 26.5 | Good: 8; Requires improvement: 6 |
| Solihull | E08000029 | England | 50 | 1,765 | 47,662 | 37.0 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 44; Requires improvement: 5 |
| Somerset | E06000066 | England | 177 | 5,532 | 152,914 | 36.2 | Outstanding: 9; Good: 144; Requires improvement: 19; Not rated: 5 |
| South Ayrshire | S12000028 | Scotland | 36 | 1,396 | 31,436 | 44.4 | Very good (5): 5; Good (4): 23; Adequate (3): 4; Not rated: 4 |
| South Cambridgeshire | E07000012 | England | 30 | 1,155 | 34,991 | 33.0 | Outstanding: 5; Good: 23; Not rated: 2 |
| South Derbyshire | E07000039 | England | 25 | 781 | 22,668 | 34.5 | Outstanding: 3; Good: 21; Requires improvement: 1 |
| South Gloucestershire | E06000025 | England | 76 | 2,310 | 58,415 | 39.5 | Outstanding: 10; Good: 60; Requires improvement: 3; Not rated: 3 |
| South Hams | E07000044 | England | 25 | 735 | 27,278 | 26.9 | Good: 22; Requires improvement: 3 |
| South Holland | E07000140 | England | 26 | 972 | 24,526 | 39.6 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 14; Requires improvement: 10 |
| South Kesteven | E07000141 | England | 29 | 1,321 | 36,053 | 36.6 | Outstanding: 3; Good: 21; Requires improvement: 3; Not rated: 2 |
| South Lanarkshire | S12000029 | Scotland | 55 | 2,446 | 71,386 | 34.3 | Very good (5): 6; Good (4): 27; Adequate (3): 13; Weak (2): 4; Not rated: 5 |
| South Norfolk | E07000149 | England | 35 | 1,134 | 37,657 | 30.1 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 25; Requires improvement: 5; Inadequate: 2; Not rated: 1 |
| South Oxfordshire | E07000179 | England | 32 | 1,419 | 34,197 | 41.5 | Outstanding: 5; Good: 22; Requires improvement: 3; Not rated: 2 |
| South Ribble | E07000126 | England | 36 | 795 | 26,101 | 30.5 | Good: 33; Requires improvement: 1; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 1 |
| South Staffordshire | E07000196 | England | 26 | 1,005 | 30,101 | 33.4 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 23; Not rated: 2 |
| South Tyneside | E08000023 | England | 30 | 1,170 | 33,222 | 35.2 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 27; Requires improvement: 2 |
| Southampton | E06000045 | England | 46 | 1,274 | 36,191 | 35.2 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 37; Requires improvement: 7; Not rated: 1 |
| Southend-on-Sea | E06000033 | England | 79 | 1,702 | 36,514 | 46.6 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 68; Requires improvement: 6; Not rated: 3 |
| Southwark | E09000028 | England | 12 | 496 | 29,969 | 16.6 | Good: 8; Requires improvement: 3; Not rated: 1 |
| Spelthorne | E07000213 | England | 16 | 625 | 19,372 | 32.3 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 13; Requires improvement: 1 |
| St Albans | E07000240 | England | 31 | 799 | 27,062 | 29.5 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 20; Requires improvement: 4; Not rated: 6 |
| St. Helens | E08000013 | England | 39 | 1,316 | 39,285 | 33.5 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 29; Requires improvement: 1; Inadequate: 2; Not rated: 5 |
| Stafford | E07000197 | England | 43 | 1,326 | 33,827 | 39.2 | Outstanding: 3; Good: 28; Requires improvement: 10; Not rated: 2 |
| Staffordshire Moorlands | E07000198 | England | 27 | 872 | 26,525 | 32.9 | Good: 13; Requires improvement: 10; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 3 |
| Stevenage | E07000243 | England | 9 | 383 | 14,643 | 26.2 | Good: 8; Requires improvement: 1 |
| Stirling | S12000030 | Scotland | 22 | 853 | 20,284 | 42.1 | Very good (5): 3; Good (4): 18; Adequate (3): 1 |
| Stockport | E08000007 | England | 59 | 2,192 | 62,213 | 35.2 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 40; Requires improvement: 17; Not rated: 1 |
| Stockton-on-Tees | E06000004 | England | 52 | 1,687 | 41,554 | 40.6 | Outstanding: 3; Good: 41; Requires improvement: 5; Not rated: 3 |
| Stoke-on-Trent | E06000021 | England | 81 | 2,516 | 46,529 | 54.1 | Outstanding: 3; Good: 58; Requires improvement: 14; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 5 |
| Stratford-on-Avon | E07000221 | England | 39 | 1,512 | 38,331 | 39.4 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 33; Requires improvement: 2; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 1 |
| Stroud | E07000082 | England | 37 | 960 | 30,768 | 31.2 | Good: 31; Requires improvement: 3; Not rated: 3 |
| Sunderland | E08000024 | England | 79 | 2,297 | 60,843 | 37.8 | Outstanding: 5; Good: 66; Requires improvement: 5; Not rated: 3 |
| Surrey Heath | E07000214 | England | 28 | 1,317 | 19,705 | 66.8 | Good: 27; Requires improvement: 1 |
| Sutton | E09000029 | England | 61 | 1,146 | 33,529 | 34.2 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 56; Requires improvement: 3; Not rated: 1 |
| Swale | E07000113 | England | 44 | 1,043 | 31,182 | 33.4 | Outstanding: 4; Good: 31; Requires improvement: 6; Not rated: 3 |
| Swansea | W06000011 | Wales | 84 | 2,067 | 51,706 | 40.0 | Excellent: 8; Good: 56; Requires improvement: 8; Requires significant improvement: 1; Not rated: 11 |
| Swindon | E06000030 | England | 43 | 1,114 | 41,020 | 27.2 | Outstanding: 3; Good: 33; Requires improvement: 5; Not rated: 2 |
| Tameside | E08000008 | England | 19 | 736 | 42,735 | 17.2 | Good: 13; Requires improvement: 5; Not rated: 1 |
| Tamworth | E07000199 | England | 13 | 403 | 16,013 | 25.2 | Good: 10; Requires improvement: 2; Not rated: 1 |
| Tandridge | E07000215 | England | 35 | 1,021 | 19,749 | 51.7 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 25; Requires improvement: 8; Inadequate: 1 |
| Teignbridge | E07000045 | England | 59 | 1,423 | 39,172 | 36.3 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 52; Requires improvement: 2; Not rated: 3 |
| Telford and Wrekin | E06000020 | England | 35 | 1,160 | 35,925 | 32.3 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 26; Requires improvement: 7; Not rated: 1 |
| Tendring | E07000076 | England | 92 | 1,925 | 47,176 | 40.8 | Good: 70; Requires improvement: 12; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 9 |
| Test Valley | E07000093 | England | 29 | 1,249 | 30,468 | 41.0 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 19; Requires improvement: 7; Not rated: 2 |
| Tewkesbury | E07000083 | England | 14 | 531 | 22,890 | 23.2 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 10; Requires improvement: 3 |
| Thanet | E07000114 | England | 48 | 1,488 | 34,817 | 42.7 | Outstanding: 4; Good: 33; Requires improvement: 8; Not rated: 3 |
| Three Rivers | E07000102 | England | 18 | 686 | 18,186 | 37.7 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 12; Requires improvement: 3; Not rated: 2 |
| Thurrock | E06000034 | England | 23 | 631 | 24,842 | 25.4 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 19; Requires improvement: 2; Not rated: 1 |
| Tonbridge and Malling | E07000115 | England | 15 | 778 | 27,227 | 28.6 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 11; Requires improvement: 3 |
| Torbay | E06000027 | England | 70 | 1,866 | 38,913 | 48.0 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 52; Requires improvement: 11; Inadequate: 2; Not rated: 3 |
| Torfaen | W06000020 | Wales | 18 | 561 | 20,185 | 27.8 | Good: 12; Requires improvement: 2; Not rated: 4 |
| Torridge | E07000046 | England | 31 | 748 | 21,407 | 34.9 | Good: 24; Requires improvement: 3; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 3 |
| Tower Hamlets | E09000030 | England | 10 | 387 | 20,317 | 19.0 | Good: 9; Requires improvement: 1 |
| Trafford | E08000009 | England | 50 | 1,507 | 43,246 | 34.8 | Outstanding: 6; Good: 35; Requires improvement: 6; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 2 |
| Tunbridge Wells | E07000116 | England | 28 | 1,204 | 24,503 | 49.1 | Good: 24; Requires improvement: 4 |
| Uttlesford | E07000077 | England | 18 | 736 | 21,071 | 34.9 | Good: 16; Requires improvement: 1; Not rated: 1 |
| Vale of Glamorgan | W06000014 | Wales | 47 | 1,042 | 31,379 | 33.2 | Excellent: 4; Good: 32; Requires improvement: 4; Not rated: 7 |
| Vale of White Horse | E07000180 | England | 25 | 1,213 | 30,719 | 39.5 | Outstanding: 3; Good: 18; Requires improvement: 2; Not rated: 2 |
| Wakefield | E08000036 | England | 85 | 2,409 | 71,492 | 33.7 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 59; Requires improvement: 18; Inadequate: 3; Not rated: 3 |
| Walsall | E08000030 | England | 56 | 1,776 | 51,197 | 34.7 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 34; Requires improvement: 16; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 3 |
| Waltham Forest | E09000031 | England | 43 | 895 | 31,338 | 28.6 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 39; Requires improvement: 3 |
| Wandsworth | E09000032 | England | 24 | 1,102 | 34,764 | 31.7 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 20; Requires improvement: 2 |
| Warrington | E06000007 | England | 50 | 1,910 | 43,594 | 43.8 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 37; Requires improvement: 10; Not rated: 1 |
| Warwick | E07000222 | England | 33 | 1,412 | 30,020 | 47.0 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 26; Requires improvement: 6 |
| Watford | E07000103 | England | 22 | 636 | 14,286 | 44.5 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 6; Requires improvement: 10; Not rated: 5 |
| Waverley | E07000216 | England | 45 | 1,803 | 30,622 | 58.9 | Outstanding: 3; Good: 30; Requires improvement: 11; Not rated: 1 |
| Wealden | E07000065 | England | 49 | 1,566 | 46,424 | 33.7 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 39; Requires improvement: 8 |
| Welwyn Hatfield | E07000241 | England | 27 | 823 | 20,392 | 40.4 | Good: 21; Requires improvement: 3; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 2 |
| West Berkshire | E06000037 | England | 38 | 869 | 34,366 | 25.3 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 32; Requires improvement: 3; Not rated: 2 |
| West Devon | E07000047 | England | 24 | 697 | 18,008 | 38.7 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 15; Requires improvement: 4; Not rated: 3 |
| West Dunbartonshire | S12000039 | Scotland | 11 | 652 | 18,948 | 34.4 | Very good (5): 1; Good (4): 6; Adequate (3): 3; Weak (2): 1 |
| West Lancashire | E07000127 | England | 28 | 1,235 | 28,179 | 43.8 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 20; Requires improvement: 5; Not rated: 1 |
| West Lindsey | E07000142 | England | 33 | 897 | 26,131 | 34.3 | Outstanding: 3; Good: 18; Requires improvement: 11; Not rated: 1 |
| West Lothian | S12000040 | Scotland | 31 | 1,032 | 34,399 | 30.0 | Very good (5): 3; Good (4): 27; Adequate (3): 1 |
| West Northamptonshire | E06000062 | England | 89 | 2,944 | 78,808 | 37.4 | Outstanding: 8; Good: 52; Requires improvement: 23; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 5 |
| West Oxfordshire | E07000181 | England | 27 | 1,354 | 27,800 | 48.7 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 20; Requires improvement: 3; Not rated: 2 |
| West Suffolk | E07000245 | England | 33 | 1,417 | 40,425 | 35.1 | Outstanding: 5; Good: 17; Requires improvement: 10; Not rated: 1 |
| Westminster | E09000033 | England | 8 | 375 | 27,643 | 13.6 | Good: 6; Not rated: 2 |
| Westmorland and Furness | E06000064 | England | 50 | 1,668 | 62,675 | 26.6 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 41; Requires improvement: 6; Not rated: 1 |
| Wigan | E08000010 | England | 49 | 1,964 | 67,701 | 29.0 | Outstanding: 4; Good: 36; Requires improvement: 5; Not rated: 4 |
| Wiltshire | E06000054 | England | 142 | 4,366 | 123,712 | 35.3 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 127; Requires improvement: 13 |
| Winchester | E07000094 | England | 34 | 1,276 | 29,327 | 43.5 | Outstanding: 3; Good: 25; Requires improvement: 4; Not rated: 2 |
| Windsor and Maidenhead | E06000040 | England | 35 | 1,441 | 30,854 | 46.7 | Outstanding: 5; Good: 20; Requires improvement: 10 |
| Wirral | E08000015 | England | 102 | 2,926 | 75,771 | 38.6 | Good: 71; Requires improvement: 23; Inadequate: 4; Not rated: 4 |
| Woking | E07000217 | England | 22 | 748 | 18,540 | 40.3 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 18; Requires improvement: 2; Not rated: 1 |
| Wokingham | E06000041 | England | 41 | 1,119 | 33,376 | 33.5 | Outstanding: 4; Good: 34; Requires improvement: 3 |
| Wolverhampton | E08000031 | England | 67 | 2,170 | 45,574 | 47.6 | Outstanding: 4; Good: 39; Requires improvement: 19; Inadequate: 1; Not rated: 4 |
| Worcester | E07000237 | England | 16 | 723 | 19,850 | 36.4 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 11; Requires improvement: 3; Not rated: 1 |
| Worthing | E07000229 | England | 71 | 1,910 | 26,544 | 72.0 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 54; Requires improvement: 14; Not rated: 2 |
| Wrexham | W06000006 | Wales | 38 | 1,270 | 29,137 | 43.6 | Excellent: 1; Good: 28; Requires improvement: 2; Requires significant improvement: 2; Not rated: 5 |
| Wychavon | E07000238 | England | 30 | 1,122 | 36,259 | 30.9 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 23; Requires improvement: 4; Not rated: 1 |
| Wyre | E07000128 | England | 37 | 1,159 | 34,913 | 33.2 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 27; Requires improvement: 7; Not rated: 1 |
| Wyre Forest | E07000239 | England | 28 | 842 | 26,751 | 31.5 | Outstanding: 1; Good: 27 |
| York | E06000014 | England | 34 | 1,504 | 40,836 | 36.8 | Outstanding: 2; Good: 24; Requires improvement: 5; Not rated: 3 |
Method
What we collected and when
On 12 November 2026 we counted every care home listed on YourCareHome, which carries every home on the four regulators' registers: the Care Quality Commission (England), the Care Inspectorate (Scotland), Care Inspectorate Wales and the Regulation and Quality Improvement Authority (Northern Ireland). The date each register was last read is given above. 15,725 homes with 495,491 beds are in the table.
Definitions
- Care home bed: the number of beds or places the regulator records for the home, as the regulator publishes it. We do not estimate missing figures: 50 homes had no bed count and are left out of the homes, beds and ratings columns.
- Listings counted: care homes (residential and nursing) only. Left out: home care agencies (17,703), listings not currently published (1,788), homes the CQC marks as dormant (85), homes whose location we could not confirm (0), homes on Jersey, Guernsey and the Isle of Man, which have no ONS population figure (118), and sample listings (2).
- Local authority: the home's postcode is looked up in the ONS Postcode Directory (edition AUG_2026), which gives its local authority district (council area in Scotland, local government district in Northern Ireland). 1 homes had a postcode the ONS Postcode Directory does not hold and are left out. Barnsley and Sheffield took new codes in 2026; the table shows the new codes and joins the ONS population on the codes ONS used for mid-2025.
- Population: people aged 65 and over in each local authority, from the ONS mid-year population estimates (mid-2025), which cover all four nations.
- Beds per 1,000: beds divided by the population aged 65 and over, times 1,000, to one decimal place. The top and bottom 10 charts include only local authorities with at least 3 homes, so that one large or small home does not decide a rank. Every local authority is in the full table.
- Rating mix: homes by the rating their own regulator gives. CQC: the overall rating. Care Inspectorate: the lowest key question grade, on its 1 to 6 scale. Care Inspectorate Wales: the lowest of its four theme ratings. RQIA does not publish ratings, so homes in Northern Ireland show as not rated. A home without a published rating is counted as not rated.
Sources and licences
- Care Quality Commission (CQC). Care Quality Commission data, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
- Care Inspectorate. Care Inspectorate datastore, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
- Care Inspectorate Wales (CIW). Care Inspectorate Wales data, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
- Regulation and Quality Improvement Authority (RQIA). RQIA register published on OpenDataNI, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
- Office for National Statistics (ONS), mid-year population estimates. Source: Office for National Statistics licensed under the Open Government Licence v.3.0.
- ONS Postcode Directory (ONSPD). Great Britain postcodes: Source: Office for National Statistics licensed under the Open Government Licence v.3.0. Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right. Contains Royal Mail data © Royal Mail copyright and database right. Contains GeoPlace data © Local Government Information House Limited copyright and database right. Northern Ireland postcodes: used under the Land and Property Services (LPS) terms that apply to Northern Ireland postcodes in the ONSPD.
These figures are our own aggregation of the regulators' and ONS data. They are not endorsed by the Care Quality Commission, the Care Inspectorate, Care Inspectorate Wales, the RQIA or ONS.
Query ych-data/beds-per-1000-over-65s/v1, built 2026-11-12 21:38:34.
Corrections
No corrections so far. Any correction is added here with its date; the figures above are never changed without a note.
How to cite this page
Adds, S. (2026). Care home beds per 1,000 people aged 65 and over, by local authority (2026 Q4). YourCareHome. Published 12 November 2026. https://yourcarehome.co.uk/data/care-home-beds-per-1000-over-65s-by-local-authority-2026-q4/
The table is also available as JSON: https://yourcarehome.co.uk/wp-json/ych/v1/data/care-home-beds-per-1000-over-65s-by-local-authority-2026-q4
Press and data enquiries
For questions about these figures or to use them in your reporting, email [email protected]. Please cite the page and its date.
