Romney House

“Risks were not being properly identified, assessed or mitigated and accidents and incidents were not always properly investigated. Systems did not enable lessons to be learnt, and medicines were not always safely managed. Not all areas of the environment were safe, including hot surfaces and lack of window restrictors. Safe procedures for staff recruitment were not always followed. Good infection control practice was not always promoted. Care planning was not person-centred or reflective of people’s needs.”

“Audits were not effective as shortfalls were not being identified. Call bell response times and night-time care provision were not being monitored. Information was not analysed to identify patterns and trends, which could be used to develop the service.”

“The service was homely, and people were supported by a consistent staff team, who knew them well. They were encouraged to lead healthier lives and their rights to choice and independence were promoted. Good relationships had been established with various health and social care providers. They visited regularly to meet people’s health care needs and give advice where required.”

“Leaders were passionate about the service and ensuring people received a good standard of care. They regularly worked alongside staff and covered at times of staff sickness and annual leave.”

“We identified 2 breaches of regulation in relation to safe care and treatment and good governance.”