Skip to main content
Unclaimed listing CQC record · synced 19 October 2026

Evelyn House

103 London Road, Enfield, Middlesex, EN2 6EU · View on map

Dementia CareResidential CareMental HealthPhysical disabilities
Regulated by CQC · England Full report ↗
Requires improvement Overall rating
InadequateRequires improv.GoodOutstanding

The CQC says: “The service is not performing as well as it should and we have told the service how it must improve.” Read the CQC report

Safe Requires improvementEffective GoodCaring GoodResponsive GoodWell-led Requires improvement

Report published 24 October 2025

Beds
5
CQC rating
Requires improvement
Registered
2018
No photos yet · operators add a full gallery & video with Advanced

Overview

Key facts

Beds5
OwnershipJackson Care

The inspection record

Care Quality CommissionEngland's independent regulator of health and social care

Overall

Requires improvement

Report published 24 October 2025

SafeRequires improvement
EffectiveGood
CaringGood
ResponsiveGood
Well-ledRequires improvement

“Date of Assessment: 13 May 2025 (site visit). The service is a residential service providing care and support mainly to people living with mental health conditions. At the time of the assessment, 6 people were being supported at the service.”

“Safety was not always managed adequately. We found concerns in how the service assessed risks to people and management of medicines. While we found no evidence of people coming to harm, these concerns indicated people were at risk of harm. The service carried out recruitment checks to make sure only suitable staff were employed. However, recruitment records for 1 staff member did not show complete adherence to safe recruitment requirements. Staff received training in a range of areas to remain knowledgeable in their roles, but there were gaps in training monitoring systems. People’s eating and drinking needs were not consistently assessed or documented. Information on people’s needs were documented in their care plans. However, the information presented was not always complete or sufficiently specific to ensure guidance for staff was clear and robust. We found inconsistencies and shortfalls in the governance of the service, including the effectiveness of quality assurance systems. These concerns amounted to a breach of regulation in relation to safe care and treatment, and a repeated breach of regulation regarding good governance. We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment. In instances where CQC has begun a process of regulatory action, we may publish this information on our website after any representations and/or appeals have been concluded, if the action has been taken forward.”

Show the full assessment summaryHide the rest of the summary

“Equally, we found a number of examples of good care and good practice. Regular meetings for people and staff were now taking place. Staff were aware of their safeguarding duties. Accidents and incidents were recorded and reviewed appropriately. Staff adhered to infection control practices to protect people from infections. People had enough to eat and drink to stay healthy. Staff monitored people’s health and wellbeing, and escalated concerns appropriately to support healthy living. The provider supported staff wellbeing. Leaders were visible and supportive, and helped staff develop in their roles. Staff felt supported to give feedback and were treated fairly. Staff worked in partnership with other organisations to provide effective care to people. The provider was no longer in breach of regulation regarding staffing.”

The Care Quality Commission · Read the CQC report
REPORT PUBLISHED 24 OCTOBER 2025 · CQC LOCATION ID 1-5088837022 View full CQC report

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Record timeline

19 Apr 2018

Registered with CQC

Evelyn House entered the official register.

24 October 2025

Rated Requires improvement overall

Report published 24 October 2025 by the Care Quality Commission.

19 October 2026

Record last synced

Details refreshed from CQC's official feed. We re-sync weekly.

Older reports from the CQC's previous inspection approach

Inspected 3 March 2021, rated Requires improvement

Registration details

Registration statusActive
Registered19 April 2018
Registered managerMr Ben John James Jackson
Council areaEdmonton and Winchmore Hill
Integrated care boardNHS North Central London Integrated Care Board
Client groupOlder Adults, Younger Adults

Location

103 London Road, Enfield, Middlesex, EN2 6EUOpen in Google Maps

Family reviews

No reviews yet for Evelyn House

Reviews on YourCareHome are written by residents and their families. Know this home? Help the next family choosing.

Frequently asked questions

What types of care is Evelyn House registered for?

Evelyn House is registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to provide Dementia Care and Residential Care. Listed specialisms include Mental Health and Physical disabilities.

How many Rooms does Evelyn House have?

There are 5 Single Rooms.

What is Evelyn House's CQC rating?

Evelyn House is rated Requires improvement by the Care Quality Commission (report published 24 October 2025). The full CQC inspection report is available at cqc.org.uk/location/1-5088837022.

How many beds does Evelyn House have?

Evelyn House is registered for 5 beds.

Who is the registered manager at Evelyn House?

The registered manager is Mr Ben John James Jackson.

When was Evelyn House last inspected?

The Care Quality Commission published its latest report on Evelyn House on 24 October 2025.

Where is Evelyn House located?

Evelyn House is located in Enfield, United Kingdom.

When did Evelyn House register with CQC?

Evelyn House first registered on 19 April 2018.

How Enfield compares

Care homes near Enfield

Run Evelyn House?

Claim this listing free to add photos, respond to enquiries and keep your details right. It only takes a couple of minutes to verify your connection.

Claim this listing

Information disclaimer. Information regarding Evelyn House is compiled from multiple sources and provided in good faith. While reasonable steps have been taken to ensure accuracy, no guarantee is given and no liability is accepted for any errors or omissions.