Carentan House

“Who the service is for”

“The service supports older people and people living with dementia.”

“The service is made up of 17 long term beds, 2 short stay beds and 5 intermediate care beds (ICB). ICB beds aim to provide rehabilitation to support people to return to a level of independence where they can return home, with or without support.”

“Support was delivered across 2 floors which was serviced by a lift and both offered communal spaces to socialise and dine. The upper floor where the ICB beds were located also had a kitchen designed for people to use, as a way of encouraging and building their confidence and independence.”

“Key findings”

“We carried out this assessment on 24th and 25th September 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.”

“People told us they felt safe at the home and relatives and visiting professionals were complimentary about how the care and support was provided. The home was welcoming, clean, tidy, and well maintained with environmental safety checks completed regularly. The service had recently been redecorated, had new flooring and a refurbished hair salon for people to have their hair and nails done. We observed people being supported in a kind and respectful way, with people encouraged to remain independent and mobile wherever possible.”

“People received their medications in a safe and timely way and medicines were stored securely. We found some gaps in the recordings of topical creams, and guidance for staff around “as and when” medication was not always in place. We also found the date of opening was not always recorded on the medications. The registered manager took immediate action to address the issues identified.”

“Care plans and risk assessments were in place and provided guidance for staff on how best to support people. We found one risk assessment was not in place as needed, however staff were aware of the potential risk and took action to mitigate it. The registered manager ensured this was put in place as soon as this was identified.”

“Staff knew the people they supported well and talked about them with kindness. One staff member described going to work as “coming home”, as he viewed the residents as family. Staff told us they were provided with extensive and good quality training, and leaders provided regular support and guidance. Staffing levels ensured interactions were not rushed or task focused. Other health care professionals told us communication with the service was good, and they felt people received a good standard of care.”

“People can only be deprived of their liberty to receive care and treatment with appropriate legal authority. In care homes, this can be done through a procedure called the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), which is part of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). We checked whether the service was working within the principles of the MCA and how they managed DoLS within the service. We found that staff and management worked within the MCA, but had not always reviewed people’s capacity to consent where there had been a change in presentation. DoLS authorisations were appropriately applied for and overseen. People were not subject to unlawful or excessive restrictions and they had choice, control and freedom over their lives.”

“People told us that the food was “amazing”, and we saw how people were offered choice. Alternatives were provided if people didn’t want what was offered. The dining experience was…”